<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Niels de Vos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ndevos@redhat.com" target="_blank">ndevos@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">We've mentioned earlier that only (small) patches for bugfixes and<br>
stabilization should get backported. Yet there is a patch with +470/-61<br>
lines proposed for inclusion. This is not something that is normally<br>
suitable for backporting, so I'd like to get the opinion of several<br>
maintainers before it gets merged.<br>
<br>
afr: allow I/O when favorite-child-policy is enabled<br>
<a href="http://review.gluster.org/16091" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://review.gluster.org/<wbr>16091</a><br>
<br>
It sounds like a serious bugfix, but I'd like to know if there is any<br>
risk for users of a version that has this patch. The version for the<br>
master branch has only been there for 2 weeks, and the 3.9 version has<br>
not been merged yet either.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We are awaiting netbsd regression to pass for merging it in 3.9. I will be planning to get this in for 3.9.1.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Niels<br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
maintainers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:maintainers@gluster.org">maintainers@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.gluster.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/maintainers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Pranith<br></div></div>
</div></div>