<div dir="ltr">Just wondering, is it going to be something more than the aggregation of BZ descriptions? Do you think it is better to callout just some BZs which are user facing compared to the normal aggregation?<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Niels de Vos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ndevos@redhat.com" target="_blank">ndevos@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Avra,<br>
<br>
<a href="http://review.gluster.org/15308" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://review.gluster.org/<wbr>15308</a> is one of your patches, and this changes<br>
the allocation of ports used. It seems to address a real problem, so it<br>
is acceptible to include it in 3.8.<br>
<br>
Because it is a user facing change (different ports), we need to mention<br>
the difference in behaviour in the release notes. Could you provide me<br>
with a suitable text that includes the problem being addressed, and how<br>
the usage of ports differs from before?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Niels<br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
maintainers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:maintainers@gluster.org">maintainers@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.gluster.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/maintainers</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Pranith<br></div></div>
</div>