Thanks for your reply ! <div>I have many data folders such as data1,data2... and this data folders contains some files. The data will be disable if one files missed. I use distributed volume storage the data folders and the files of data folder is distributed to all bricks. The all data folders will be disable if one brick down. I think out the <span style="font-family: "lucida Grande", Verdana, "Microsoft YaHei";">distributed replica volume,but d</span><font face="lucida Grande, Verdana, Microsoft YaHei">isk utilization is less than 50% whth </font><span style="font-family: "lucida Grande", Verdana, "Microsoft YaHei";">replica volume</span><span style="font-family: "lucida Grande", Verdana, "Microsoft YaHei";">.I can put up with some data missing ,but I cann't tolerate all data being disable. So,I want the data folder storage just one brick,so that ,if one brick down , it has some data folder disable in this brick and other data is well.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: "lucida Grande", Verdana, "Microsoft YaHei";"> </span></div><div><font face="lucida Grande, Verdana, Microsoft YaHei">Thanks,</font></div><div><font face="lucida Grande, Verdana, Microsoft YaHei">LiLi</font></div><div> </div><div><sign signid="0"><div style="color:#909090;font-family:Arial Narrow;font-size:12px">------------------</div><div style='font-size:14px;font-family:Verdana;color:#000;'><b>----------------------</b><font face="Arial Black">李立</font></div></sign></div><div> </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div style="font-size: 12px;font-family: Arial Narrow;padding:2px 0 2px 0;">------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------</div><div style="font-size: 12px;background:#efefef;padding:8px;"><div><b>发件人:</b> "jin deng"<cheneydeng88@gmail.com>; </div><div><b>发送时间:</b> 2016年11月17日(星期四) 下午4:13</div><div><b>收件人:</b> "李立"<dylan-lili@foxmail.com>; </div><div><b >抄送:</b> "gluster-users"<gluster-users@gluster.org>; </div><div><b>主题:</b> [Gluster-users] How to distributed with a folder</div></div><div><br></div>if you are worrying about the disk failure will bring all your data unavailable,the distributed replica volume is a good choice.<br><br><span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(204, 204, 204); position: relative;" t="5" times="" isout="0">2016年11月17日</span>星期四,jin deng <<a target="_blank">cheneydeng88@gmail.com</a>> 写道:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br><br><span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(204, 204, 204); position: relative;" t="5" times="" isout="0">2016年11月17日</span>星期四,李立 <<a>dylan-lili@foxmail.com</a>> 写道:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><span style=" color:rgb(36,39,41); ; ; ">In distributed volume, the files will be distributed to different bricks.But,my data is a folder if it's lack of a file,the folder of data will be disabled.So, I want a specific folder will be store one brick to avoid dropping a brick and all data is disable.</span></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div> I don't understand your purpose.It seems you want all your data which inside one specific directory to be stored on a fixed brick(without dht) instead of letting the data dispersed among all bricks.IMO,that violates the model of "distributed volume".Not sure if i've misunderstood your purpose.Maybe someone will give a different opinion.</div>
<br><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Thanks,<div>DengJin</div></div><br>
</blockquote>
<br><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Thanks,<div>DengJin</div></div><br>
<style type="text/css">.qmbox style, .qmbox script, .qmbox head, .qmbox link, .qmbox meta {display: none !important;}</style>