<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">We have a 2 node, distributed replicated setup (11 bricks on each node). Each of these bricks are 6TB in size.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">node_A:/brick1 replicates node_B:/brick1</div><div class="">node_A:/brick2 replicates node_B:/brick2</div><div class="">node_A:/brick3 replicates node_B:/brick3</div><div class="">…</div><div class="">…</div><div class="">node_A:/brick11 replicates node_B:/brick11</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">We recently added 5 more bricks to make it 16 bricks on each node in total. Each of these new bricks are 8TB in size.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">We completed a full rebalance operation (status says “completed”).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">However the end result is somewhat unexpected:</div><div class=""><div class=""><b class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdl1 7.3T 2.2T 5.2T 29%</font></b></div><div class=""><b class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdk1 7.3T 2.0T 5.3T 28%</font></b></div><div class=""><b class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdj1 7.3T 2.0T 5.3T 28%</font></b></div><div class=""><b class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdn1 7.3T 2.2T 5.2T 30%</font></b></div><div class=""><b class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdp1 7.3T 2.2T 5.2T 30%</font></b></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdc1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 42%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdf1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 43%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdo1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 42%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sda1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 43%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdi1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 42%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdh1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 43%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sde1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 42%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdb1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 42%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdm1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 42%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdg1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 42%</font></div><div class=""><font face="Courier New" class="">/dev/sdd1 5.5T 2.3T 3.2T 42%</font></div></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The df output in <b class="">bold</b> are the new 8TB drives.</div><div class="">Was I wrong to expect the % usage to be roughly equal? Is there some parameter I need to tweak to make rebalance account for disk sizes properly?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I’m using Gluster 3.8 on Ubuntu.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks,</div><div class="">Jackie</div></body></html>
<br>
<p><font color="#808080" face="Courier New" size="1">The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.</font></p>