<html><body><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div><br></div><div>Hi,<br></div><div><br></div><div>Considering all the other factor same for both the configuration, yes small configuration <br></div><div>would take less time. To read good copies, it will take less time.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I think, multi threaded shd is the only enhancement in near future.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Ashish<br></div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr"><div style="color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;" data-mce-style="color: #000; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Serkan Çoban" <cobanserkan@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"Gluster Users" <gluster-users@gluster.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Monday, August 8, 2016 4:02:22 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>[Gluster-users] ec heal questions<br><div><br></div>Hi,<br><div><br></div>Assume we have 8+2 and 16+4 ec configurations and we just replaced a<br>broken disk in each configuration which has 100GB of data. In which<br>case heal completes faster? Does heal speed has anything related with<br>ec configuration?<br><div><br></div>Assume we are in 16+4 ec configuration. When heal starts it reads 16<br>chunks from other bricks recompute our chunks and writes it to just<br>replaced disk. Am I correct?<br><div><br></div>If above assumption is true then small ec configurations heals faster right?<br><div><br></div>Is there any improvements in 3.7.14+ that makes ec heal faster?(Other<br>than multi-thread shd for ec)<br><div><br></div>Thanks,<br>Serkan<br>_______________________________________________<br>Gluster-users mailing list<br>Gluster-users@gluster.org<br>http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users<br></div><div><br></div></div></body></html>