<div dir="ltr">The third statement in your route table states that for any network the default gateway is <span style="font-size:12.8px">192.168.122.1</span><div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">I would suggest either you remove that statement or increase the metrics from 0, you already have a route to 192.168.122.0, it is in same broadcast domain so you don't have to go through the gateway.</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Cheers</span></div><div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Dev</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Joshua J. Kugler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joshua@azariah.com" target="_blank">joshua@azariah.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 22:12:00 Russell Purinton wrote:<br>
</span><span class="">> If the subnet mask is wrong on 122.11 it may forward all traffic to the<br>
> default gateway. The default gateway may be configured to NAT traffic from<br>
> the LAN, so the response packet would be seen by .10 as coming from .1.<br>
<br>
</span>So, it turns out the subnet isn't wrong, but for some reason, it's still<br>
routing through the gateway, and appears to be coming from .1, instead of .11.<br>
I'm not sure why. This is a libvirt network, configured thus:<br>
<br>
<network><br>
<name>default</name><br>
<uuid>f137a5c4-1dd2-453a-a6e6-c161f2918d41</uuid><br>
<forward mode='route'/><br>
<bridge name='virbr0' stp='on' delay='0'/><br>
<mac address='52:54:00:42:87:a9'/><br>
<ip address='192.168.122.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'><br>
<dhcp><br>
<range start='192.168.122.2' end='192.168.122.254'/><br>
</dhcp><br>
</ip><br>
</network><br>
<br>
When this was working, I was using forward mode=nat, but then two different<br>
libvirt networks couldn't talk to each other. The two machines are on the<br>
same segment, on the same virtual switch. I'm not sure why they are getting<br>
routing through the gateway. Off to do more troubleshooting! :)<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
j<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
Joshua J. Kugler - Fairbanks, Alaska<br>
Azariah Enterprises - Programming and Website Design<br>
<a href="mailto:joshua@azariah.com">joshua@azariah.com</a> - Jabber: <a href="mailto:pedahzur@gmail.com">pedahzur@gmail.com</a><br>
PGP Key: <a href="http://pgp.mit.edu/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://pgp.mit.edu/</a> ID 0x73B13B6A<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gluster-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>