<div dir="ltr">It would be nice to have RHGS's equivalent in CentOS, keeping with the general theme of CentOS. Any reason why that hasn't been considered ? </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:25 AM, C.L. Martinez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:carlopmart@gmail.com" target="_blank">carlopmart@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 11/10/2015 09:18 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Gluster users running on CentOS!<br>
<br>
As you may have heard before, we're planning on providing stable Gluster<br>
releases and related packages through the CentOS Storage SIG [0]. We<br>
would like to know what version of Gluster and which versions of CentOS<br>
are most wanted by our users.<br>
<br>
The current support for Gluster defines 3 stable releases at the time.<br>
This means that 3.7, 3.6 and 3.5 are supported by the Gluster Community.<br>
Once 3.8 is released, 3.5 will become unsupported and will not receive<br>
any updates anymore. 3.8 is planned to be released early 2016 [1].<br>
<br>
We can provide all Gluster packages for CentOS-7 and 6, but CentOS-5 can<br>
only get recent versions of the Gluster client.<br>
<br>
Now, we want to know which combinations our users like to see in the<br>
CentOS Storage SIG:<br>
<br>
- CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.7: latest and greatest, will be included<br>
- CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.7: very much used release, also included<br>
<br>
- CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you?<br>
- CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you?<br>
<br>
- CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you?<br>
- CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you?<br>
<br>
- CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.7 (client only): nobody?<br>
- CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.6: nobody?<br>
- CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.5: nobody?<br>
<br>
<br>
Please speak up and let us know what versions you depend on for next few<br>
months. You can reply to this email to the list (note that it is<br>
x-posted, one mailinglist is sufficient for your reply), directly to me<br>
or over IRC in #centos-devel or #gluster.<br>
<br>
Many thanks,<br>
Niels<br>
<br>
<br>
0. <a href="https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage</a><br>
1. <a href="https://www.gluster.org/community/roadmap/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.gluster.org/community/roadmap/</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div></div>
Hi all,<br>
<br>
My production environments runs Gluster 3.7 for CentOS-7/6. I am not planning to use CentOS-5.<br>
<br>
Thanks.<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gluster-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org" target="_blank">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>