<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 6 November 2015 at 17:22, Krutika Dhananjay <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kdhananj@redhat.com" target="_blank">kdhananj@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Sure. So far I've just been able to figure that GlusterFS counts blocks in multiples of 512B while XFS seems to count them in multiples of 4.0KB.<br></div><div>Let me again try creating sparse files on xfs, sharded and non-sharded gluster volumes and compare the results. I'll let you know what I find.<br></div><div></div></blockquote></div><br><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I repeated the tests with a single gluster brick on a ext4 partition - disk usage (du) and file size were exactly right.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Lindsay</div>
</div></div>