<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 30 September 2015 at 18:50, Frank Rothenstein <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:f.rothenstein@bodden-kliniken.de" target="_blank">f.rothenstein@bodden-kliniken.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":x0" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden"> My brick<br>
-nodes are also ovirt-Nodes (VM-Hosts), </div></blockquote><div><br><br></div><div>I should have said that my brick noders are also VM nodes (Proxmox). 64 GB Ram, E5-2620 CPU<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":x0" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">rep=3, i have 3 bricks per node.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Are your bricks separate disks? I assumed it would be better to let zfs handle multiple disks with striping/caching and just present one brick (zpool dataset) to gluster.<br></div><div><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":x0" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">
Running VMs directly on the bricks may<br>
improve your VMs by using L2ARC...</div></blockquote></div><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Not sure what you mean by that - you run the vm direct from the brick on zfs rather than via the gluster mount? doesn't that mess with the replication?<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">thanks,<br clear="all"></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Lindsay</div>
</div></div>