<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head></head>
<body>
<div>Hello,</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I have been using NFS to mount my gluster volumes and they have been working pretty well. But I just realized how easy it is to mount volumes using glusterfs.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font face="Courier">mount -t glusterfs glusterserver:/myvol /mymount</font></div>
<div><font face="Courier"><span style="font-size: 23px;"><br></span></font></div>
<div>I used NFS because I was just so used to it. So I was wondering will I have to look out for any performance hits, pitfalls or gotchas if I just use a glusterfs mount? I was looking for some documentation comparing them but couldn’t find anything except (<a href="https://joejulian.name/blog/nfs-mount-for-glusterfs-gives-better-read-performance-for-small-files/">https://joejulian.name/blog/nfs-mount-for-glusterfs-gives-better-read-performance-for-small-files/</a>)</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div class="unibox-signature">- Jordan</div>
</body>
</html>