<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><body style='font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>Bump!</p>
<p>On 2015-02-16 16:19, Ernie Dunbar wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<p>Hi list.</p>
<p>I've searched around and I've found that nobody seems to have asked this question before. Is it 100% necessary to have Gluster bricks that are formatted with XFS, and is it also 100% necessary that it needs to be its own partition and/or drive?<br /><br />If it does, I think there needs to be something mentioned about this at <a href="http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Getting_started_setup_baremetal">http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Getting_started_setup_baremetal</a>. If not, I wonder at why there's such an insistence on doing so at <a href="http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Getting_started_configure">http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Getting_started_configure</a> and at <a href="http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Getting_started_rrqsg">http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Getting_started_rrqsg</a>. <br /><br />Also, if this is indeed 100% necessary, then I have to go back and reinstall Ubuntu on these servers. Again.</p>
<div> </div>
<!-- html ignored --><br />
<pre>_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a>
<a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users">http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<div> </div>
</body></html>