<html><head></head><body>I think switches are much faster at their job than the kernel and avoiding their use may be a mistake.<br>
<br>
With regard to gluster, latency affects performance so if it's performance you're looking for, lowest latency switches would be wiser. <br>
<br>
If it's just network design you're asking for, this might not be the most appropriate forum. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On February 14, 2015 2:19:43 AM PST, Ml Ml <mliebherr99@googlemail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Hello List,<br /><br />i would like to build a 3 Node Cluster. I was thinking of such a setup:<br /><br /><a href="http://oi58.tinypic.com/2rfgghi.jpg">http://oi58.tinypic.com/2rfgghi.jpg</a><br /><br />My question:<br /><br />Can i set it up my network that way, that it will still work of one node fails?<br /><br />Just thinking about i want bonding and then i might even need a brige<br />to bring the "two sides of the nodes together"?<br /><br />Will i then get loop? Do i need SPF or something alike?<br /><br />Could i also use TCP Multipath? ( i have no experience with tcp<br />multipath so far)<br /><br />What do you think?<br /><br /><br />Thanks,<br />Mario<br /><br />p.s. i want to avoid switches here.<br /><hr /><br />Gluster-users mailing list<br />Gluster-users@gluster.org<br /><a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users">http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>