<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nigelb@redhat.com" target="_blank">nigelb@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello folks,<br>
<br>
We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. We've<br>
only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the<br>
following:<br>
<br>
If you do not have a commit in the last 90 days, your membership from<br>
gluster-maintainers team on Gerrit will be revoked. This means you won't have<br>
permission to merge patches. This does not mean you're no longer maintainer.<br>
This is only a security measure. To gain access again, all you have to do is<br>
file a bug against gluster-infra and I'll grant you access immediately.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Just need a clarification. Does a "commit in the last 90 days" means merging a patch sent by someone else by maintainer or maintainer sending a patch to be merged?<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
When I remove someone's access, I'll send an invidual email about it. Again,<br>
your membership on gluster-maintainers has no say on your maintainer status.<br>
This is only for security reasons.<br>
<br>
Thoughts on implementing this policy?<br>
<br>
--<br>
nigelb<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Gluster-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-devel@gluster.org">Gluster-devel@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.gluster.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Pranith<br></div></div>
</div></div>