<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Raised <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405301">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405301</a> and <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405305">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405305</a> for master and release-3.9 respectively.<br><br></div>I've sent patches to move this test under the bad tests category until Niels' patch fixes the crash.<br></div>This is to prevent the two patches on which the test is failing and another crash fix that cannot be<br></div>merged until these two patches are, from being blocked.<br><br></div>-Krutika<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Anoop C S <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anoopcs@redhat.com" target="_blank">anoopcs@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 04:10 -0500, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:<br>
><br>
> Oh ok. I see that in ./tests/basic/gfapi/<wbr>bug1291259.c the function glfs_upcall_get_reason() is<br>
> causing segmentation fault, as per the stderr messages.<br>
<br>
</span>Another recent failure in master branch:<br>
<a href="https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2168/console" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://build.gluster.org/job/<wbr>centos6-regression/2168/<wbr>console</a><br>
<span class=""><br>
> Adding Niels, if he wants to take a look at this.<br>
><br>
> We can mark the test bad by raising a Bz i suppose.<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Poornima<br>
><br>
</span><span class="">> From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <<a href="mailto:kdhananj@redhat.com">kdhananj@redhat.com</a>><br>
> To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <<a href="mailto:pgurusid@redhat.com">pgurusid@redhat.com</a>><br>
> Cc: "Soumya Koduri" <<a href="mailto:skoduri@redhat.com">skoduri@redhat.com</a>>, "Pranith Karampuri" <<a href="mailto:pkarampu@redhat.com">pkarampu@redhat.com</a>><br>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 1:49:27 AM<br>
> Subject: Re: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure<br>
><br>
> No unfortunately I had no success with recreating the failure either on my setup or on a borrowed<br>
> centos from jenkins cluster.<br>
><br>
> Ok this is good information. I didn't know it had failed on other patches too. I thought it's only<br>
> with my patch.<br>
> Can this be marked as a bad test in that case?<br>
><br>
> -Krutika<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah <<a href="mailto:pgurusid@redhat.com">pgurusid@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Hi,<br>
> ><br>
> > Are you able consistently reproduce this on your local system as well? If so can you share the<br>
> > system?<br>
> > I see that it has failed for many other patches as well. <a href="http://fstat.gluster.org/weeks/1/failur" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://fstat.gluster.org/<wbr>weeks/1/failur</a><br>
> > e/34<br>
> ><br>
> > Regards,<br>
> > Poornima<br>
</span><span class="">> > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <<a href="mailto:kdhananj@redhat.com">kdhananj@redhat.com</a>><br>
> > To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <<a href="mailto:pgurusid@redhat.com">pgurusid@redhat.com</a>>, "Soumya Koduri" <<a href="mailto:skoduri@redhat.com">skoduri@redhat.com</a>><br>
> > Cc: "Pranith Karampuri" <<a href="mailto:pkarampu@redhat.com">pkarampu@redhat.com</a>><br>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 8:47:57 AM<br>
> > Subject: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Hi,<br>
> ><br>
> > The test tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t seems to be failing consistently on my 3.9 backport http<br>
> > ://<a href="http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16046/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">review.gluster.org/#/c/<wbr>16046/</a><br>
> ><br>
> > The patch itself makes changes only in compound fops, so it is unlikely that the failure is<br>
> > caused by the patch itself.<br>
> ><br>
> > Here's a sample failure run: <a href="https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2134/console" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://build.gluster.org/job/<wbr>centos6-regression/2134/<wbr>console</a><br>
> ><br>
> > I ran the test on my laptop and it passes consistently.<br>
> > I ran the test on a borrowed centos slave and it passes there as well.<br>
> > I looked at the logfile bug1291259.log from the archived build failure logs<br>
> > but there are no failures.<br>
> ><br>
> > If you have any ideas on how to proceed further, could you please suggest the same?<br>
> ><br>
> > -Krutika<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
><br>
</span>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> Gluster-devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Gluster-devel@gluster.org">Gluster-devel@gluster.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.gluster.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>