<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Niels de Vos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ndevos@redhat.com" target="_blank">ndevos@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Sac,<br>
<br>
Is it correct that gdeploy requires Ansible 2.1 or newer[0]? Last week<br>
I've had a discussion at the CentOS Interlock meeting with others about<br>
getting Ansible provided by the CentOS CfgMgmt SIG. Their plan is to<br>
provide distinct repositories for Ansible 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2[1], with an<br>
option to have something like ansible-2-latest[2].<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Preferred version of ansible for gdeploy is 2.2, however gdeploy is compatible with</div><div>2.1 version of ansible. It would be great if we can ship ansible 2.2.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
At the moment I am thinking about how to structure new repositories that<br>
can work with different versions of GlusterFS. A repository with<br>
miscellaneous tools that do not have direct dependencies on a glusterfs<br>
RPM might be most useful.<br>
<br>
centos-release-gluster-tools<br>
- depends on an unversioned centos-release-gluster<br>
- contains packages like gdeploy<br>
(makes the -tools repository depend on centos-release-ansible-2)<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This sounds good.</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Heketi could well be part of this repository too. It runs on a system<br>
that does not require Gluster packages to be installed.<br>
<br>
What do you think, does this work for gdeploy?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes. This works for gdeploy.</div><div><br></div><div>-sac</div></div></div></div>