<div dir="ltr">Short answer: Yes, but not right away.<br><br>I discussed this with Kaleb at the summit. I'd like to own packaging entirely (and automate it), but once I have more time to do so. My primary concern right now is lack of time.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Vijay Bellur <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vbellur@redhat.com" target="_blank">vbellur@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Niels de Vos <<a href="mailto:ndevos@redhat.com">ndevos@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:05:55PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:<br>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Joe Julian <<a href="mailto:joe@julianfamily.org">joe@julianfamily.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > On 10/18/2016 09:52 AM, Shane StClair wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Yes, I'm well aware that packages are built by volunteers. Right now<br>
>> > Gluster's Debian repos are breaking apt updates for anyone using these<br>
>> > repos, all of which previously worked:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > <a href="https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.7/LATEST/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://download.gluster.org/<wbr>pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.7/<wbr>LATEST/</a><br>
>> > <a href="https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.8/LATEST/Debian/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://download.gluster.org/<wbr>pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.8/<wbr>LATEST/Debian/</a><br>
>> > <a href="https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/Debian/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://download.gluster.org/<wbr>pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/<wbr>Debian/</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> > I'm trying to alert the volunteer(s) to this situation<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > +1<br>
>> ><br>
>> > And I asked him to email here since those volunteers are on this list and I<br>
>> > don't know who they are for certain. I know there was a bulk of vacations<br>
>> > last week so I suspected it might be related, but I didn't know for sure.<br>
>> > It's worthy of a poke just to make sure it wasn't some sort of error or<br>
>> > oversight.<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > since I assume the intent is to not break systems, and to advise that Debian<br>
>> > users be directed to not use LATEST URLs if this is the new normal.<br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>> Can we change the directory structure from <release>/LATEST/<distro><br>
>> to <release>/<distro>/LATEST? Doing it that way will provide<br>
>> volunteers the liberty to change LATEST for a distro after the related<br>
>> packages are uploaded.<br>
><br>
> Yes, I think that would be good.<br>
><br>
> The current/old <release>/LATEST/<distro> can then become a symlink to<br>
> the <release>/<distro>/LATEST so that we dont break it for everyone.<br>
><br>
> Kaleb is doing most (if not all!) packaging that pops up on<br>
> <a href="http://download.gluster.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">download.gluster.org</a>. Nigel and Misc showed some interest in helping<br>
> out, and maybe the can start with creating this new structure?<br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div>Bumping up this thread as we have not reached a conclusion.<br>
<br>
Misc/Nigel - would you be able to help with the restructuring<br>
described in this thread?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Vijay<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">nigelb<br></div></div>
</div>