<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com" target="_blank">gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">2016-09-22 18:34 GMT+02:00 Amye Scavarda <<a href="mailto:amye@redhat.com">amye@redhat.com</a>>:<br>
> Nope! RHGS is the supported version and <a href="http://gluster.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">gluster.org</a> is the open source<br>
> version. We'd like to keep the documentation reflecting that, but good<br>
> catch.<br>
<br>
</span>Ok but features should be the same, right?<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Yes, features would be same, infact upstream would be ahead of RHGS.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Similarly our upstream documentation will be ahead of Red Hat documentation.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"></div><div class="gmail_extra"></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>I should have been more clear. In Red Hat documentation there are lot of<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">references to version specific changes which will not be applicable to <br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Gluster releases. Also there is branding difference Red Hat like to call<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">the product "Red Hat Gluster Storage" (RHGS) and we "Gluster"<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">-Rajesh<br></div></div>