<div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>when will these patch be included in gluster official version ?</div><div><br></div><div>I upgraded my client to 3.7.8, but still have big leak following rsync jobs</div><div><br></div><div><div><font face="monospace, monospace"> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND</font></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace"> 1570 root 20 0 7404740 <b>6.210g</b> 4108 S 0.0 <b>40.0</b> 106:24.02 glusterfs</font></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace"> 1573 root 20 0 3796044 2.924g 3580 S 0.0 18.8 7:07.05 glusterfs</font></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace"> 1571 root 20 0 2469924 1.695g 3588 S 0.0 10.9 1:19.75 glusterfs</font></div></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace"><br></font></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace">thanks</font></div><div><font face="monospace, monospace"><br></font></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature">Cordialement,<br>Mathieu CHATEAU<br><a href="http://www.lotp.fr" target="_blank">http://www.lotp.fr</a></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-02-16 18:54 GMT+01:00 Soumya Koduri <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:skoduri@redhat.com" target="_blank">skoduri@redhat.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
<br>
On 02/16/2016 08:06 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hmm, OK. I've rechecked 3.7.8 with the following patches (latest<br>
revisions):<br>
<br>
===<br>
Soumya Koduri (3):<br>
gfapi: Use inode_forget in case of handle objects<br>
inode: Retire the inodes from the lru list in inode_table_destroy<br>
rpc: Fix for rpc_transport_t leak<br>
===<br>
<br>
Here is Valgrind output: [1]<br>
<br>
It seems that all leaks are gone, and that is very nice.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
At least major chunk of leaks seem to have gone. Many thanks to you too for very detailed tests and analysis :)<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
-Soumya</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Many thanks to all devs.<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://gist.github.com/anonymous/eddfdaf3eb7bff458326" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://gist.github.com/anonymous/eddfdaf3eb7bff458326</a><br>
<br>
16.02.2016 15:30, Soumya Koduri wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I have tested using your API app (I/Os done - create,write and stat).<br>
I still do not see any inode related leaks. However I posted another<br>
fix for rpc_transport object related leak [1].<br>
<br>
I request you to re-check if you have the latest patch of [2] applied<br>
in your build.<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13456/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13456/</a><br>
[2] <a href="http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13125/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13125/</a><br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gluster-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org" target="_blank">Gluster-users@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>