<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Namaste Vijay,<br><br></div>There is no mention of including ZFS snapshot feature support in Glusterfs v3.7.<br><br></div>Any updates on it ?<br><br></div><div>Thanks,<br></div>Kiran.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Vijay Bellur <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vbellur@redhat.com" target="_blank">vbellur@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 02/23/2015 05:52 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi All,<br>
<br>
It is going to be a busy week for us considering the upcoming 3.7<br>
feature freeze over the weekend. To facilitate timely reviews, I have<br>
setup an etherpad [1] that will contain the list of patches related to<br>
features which you would like to be reviewed before then. Can owners of<br>
respective features update the etherpad so that reviewers know the<br>
patches that need to be picked up on a priority basis? After doing this,<br>
please be available in #gluster-dev on freenode so that any realtime<br>
queries regarding your patch can be answered.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Also it would be great if more of us can review any/all patches<br>
mentioned in the etherpad this week. Even if you are not familiar with<br>
the entire patchset, providing an update on subset of files that you<br>
have been able to review would vastly help in reducing the review burden<br>
on core reviewers. If you have not been active on gerrit for code<br>
reviews but intend being so, there is no better time than this week to<br>
get started!<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Thanks to all who helped with reviews this week. I propose that we push out the feature freeze date by slightly more than a week. Some rationale for that:<br>
<br>
1. Accommodate more reviews - several patchsets are still being refreshed.<br>
<br>
2. Every major feature merged requires a refresh from other features as there are common areas of code in glusterd etc. being modified.<br>
<br>
3. Some feature owners do seem to require a bit more time to make the feature more complete.<br>
<br>
4. Regression infrastructure was flaky last week but thanks to Justin we seem to be doing good now.<br>
<br>
I propose Monday, March 9th as the new date for feature freeze. If there are no objections, I will update the 3.7 planning page [2] and I don't expect other milestones for 3.7 to be affected because of this variation in schedule.<br>
<br>
I have also added a reviewer tag for all features listed in the review etherpad at [1]. If you are reviewing a feature or interested in contributing to reviews, please add yourself as a reviewer for the feature in the etherpad so that we can collaborate better.<span class=""><br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Vijay<br>
<br>
[1] <a href="https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/review-for-glusterfs-3.7" target="_blank">https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/<u></u>review-for-glusterfs-3.7</a><br>
<br></span>
[2] <a href="http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning37" target="_blank">http://www.gluster.org/<u></u>community/documentation/index.<u></u>php/Planning37</a><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Gluster-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gluster-devel@gluster.org" target="_blank">Gluster-devel@gluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel" target="_blank">http://www.gluster.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>